微信公众号搜"智元新知"关注
微信扫一扫可直接关注哦!

Postgresql COALESCE性能问题

我在 Postgresql中有这个表:

CREATE TABLE my_table
(
    id bigint NOT NULL,value bigint,CONSTRAINT my_table_pkey PRIMARY KEY (id)
);

my_table中有大约50000行.

问题是,为什么查询

SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE id = COALESCE(null,id) and value = ?

比这个慢:

SELECT * FROM my_table WHERE value = ?

除了在app-layer中优化查询字符串之外,还有其他解决方案吗?

编辑:实际上,问题是如何重写查询select * from my_table where id = coalesce(?,id)和value =?最坏情况下的表现不低于select * from my_table,其中value =?在Postgresql 9.0中

解决方法

尝试重写表单的查询

SELECT *
  FROM my_table
 WHERE value = ?
   AND (? IS NULL OR id = ?)

从我自己的快速测试

INSERT INTO my_table select generate_series(1,50000),1;
UPDATE my_table SET value = id%17;

CREATE INDEX val_idx ON my_table(value);

VACUUM ANALYZE my_table;

\set idval 17
\set pval   0

explain analyze 
SELECT *
  FROM my_table
 WHERE value = :pval
   AND (:idval IS NULL OR id = :idval);

Index Scan using my_table_pkey on my_table  (cost=0.00..8.29 rows=1 width=16) (actual time=0.034..0.035 rows=1 loops=1)
   Index Cond: (id = 17)
   Filter: (value = 0)
 Total runtime: 0.064 ms

\set idval null

explain analyze 
SELECT *
  FROM my_table
 WHERE value = :pval
   AND (:idval IS NULL OR id = :idval);

Bitmap Heap Scan on my_table  (cost=58.59..635.62 rows=2882 width=16) (actual time=0.373..1.594 rows=2941 loops=1)
   Recheck Cond: (value = 0)
   ->  Bitmap Index Scan on validx  (cost=0.00..57.87 rows=2882 width=0) (actual time=0.324..0.324 rows=2941 loops=1)
         Index Cond: (value = 0)
 Total runtime: 1.811 ms

版权声明:本文内容由互联网用户自发贡献,该文观点与技术仅代表作者本人。本站仅提供信息存储空间服务,不拥有所有权,不承担相关法律责任。如发现本站有涉嫌侵权/违法违规的内容, 请发送邮件至 [email protected] 举报,一经查实,本站将立刻删除。

相关推荐